Pyrmont NSW 2009

Splitting strata, landlord and tenant cleaning duties in a Pyrmont building

In a converted warehouse holding offices, apartments and a ground floor venue, three parties may each be responsible for some cleaning and none of them holds a document showing where their responsibility ends. The corridors between them tell you exactly where that is a problem.

Request a fixed quote Call 02 5839 3012

In short

In a mixed-use building the owners corporation is generally responsible for common property, a landlord for anything within its lot that is not the tenant's, and each occupier for its own premises. Cleaning arrangements should map to those boundaries and state them, because the physical layout rarely makes them obvious.

Clean Best records the boundary in the scope for whichever party engages it, naming the areas included and the adjoining areas excluded. Where a building has several cleaning arrangements running at once, we identify the seams at the walkthrough so gaps can be raised before they become a condition complaint.

Three responsibilities, one building

The owners corporation covers common property: lobbies, lifts, stairs, corridors, bin rooms, car parks and shared amenities. A landlord within a lot may be responsible for areas outside a tenant's demise, such as a shared kitchen serving two tenancies on one floor. Each occupier covers its own premises. On paper that is clear; in a converted building with irregular layouts it frequently is not.

The seams are the problem. A corridor serving two tenancies, a shared washroom on a commercial floor, a rear service passage, a loading area used by the ground floor venue and a bin room shared between residential and commercial users. Each is arguably somebody's, and each is regularly attended by nobody because the parties assume the other's contractor covers it. Rear service passages are the most common of these, since they serve everyone, are seen by nobody and appear in no scope until a fire inspection mentions them.

Mapping the seams before they become complaints

The exercise is straightforward: walk the building with a floor plan and mark every space, then ask who cleans it and under which arrangement. Anything without an answer is a gap. Twenty to thirty minutes covers most buildings, and it is worth doing when a new cleaning contract starts because that is when someone is actually looking at the whole building rather than one tenancy.

Record the outcome in each affected scope rather than in a separate document nobody holds. A scope that names the adjoining areas as excluded, and says who does cover them, answers the complaint before it escalates. It also gives the owners corporation or landlord something concrete to act on when a genuine gap is identified. Where a gap is genuinely nobody's, saying so in writing is more useful than quietly absorbing it, because absorption removes the pressure to resolve it.

Where commercial and residential uses interact

Mixed-use buildings generate friction at specific points: waste, noise, hours and shared entries. A ground floor venue producing significant waste through a bin room shared with residents is the classic example, and the cleaning arrangement is where the tension surfaces even though the cause is usually capacity or scheduling rather than cleaning. Hours are the other flashpoint, since a venue closing at two in the morning and a resident leaving for work at six share a lobby they experience very differently.

Recording what is found, rather than absorbing it, is what allows the building to address the cause. A record showing the bin room overflowing on Saturday mornings gives the owners corporation something to take to the venue or the waste contractor. Clean Best reports those observations to the engaging party so the issue reaches whoever can actually resolve it.

Duty mapping for a Pyrmont mixed-use building

Building walked with a floor plan, every space marked and assigned
Seams identified: shared corridors, washrooms, service passages, bin rooms
Each scope naming adjoining excluded areas and who covers them
Gaps raised with the owners corporation or landlord in writing
Waste arrangements checked where commercial and residential use share a room
Mapping repeated when a tenancy or use changes

Clean Best supervisor completing an office cleaning quality check in NSW

Working in Pyrmont and the Inner City

Pyrmont in the Inner City mixes offices, media businesses, apartments and hospitality venues, much of it within converted warehouse and wharf buildings where floor plates are irregular and circulation spaces were adapted rather than designed. Buildings there commonly combine residential and commercial uses over the same core, sharing entries, lifts and waste facilities. Ground floor venues operate late while residents are at home. Clean Best services Pyrmont from Seven Hills and maps the seams at the walkthrough rather than assuming the boundary is obvious.

Questions about Pyrmont

Which spaces most often fall between arrangements?

Corridors serving two tenancies, shared washrooms on commercial floors, rear service passages, loading areas and bin rooms shared between residential and commercial users. Each is arguably somebody's responsibility, which is why each is regularly attended by nobody. Walking the building with a plan and assigning every space is the only reliable way to find them.

Who should carry out the mapping exercise?

Whoever is engaging a new contractor, because that is when someone is looking at the whole building rather than one tenancy. The contractor can do the walk and produce the list; the decisions about who covers what belong to the owners corporation, the landlord and the occupiers. Twenty to thirty minutes usually covers a building of this type.

Where should the outcome be recorded?

In each affected scope rather than in a separate document nobody holds. A scope naming the adjoining areas as excluded, and stating who does cover them, answers a complaint immediately. Separate mapping documents tend to be produced once, filed, and never consulted when the question actually arises.

What causes most friction in mixed-use buildings?

Waste, noise, hours and shared entries, particularly where a hospitality venue shares facilities with residents. The cleaning arrangement is where the tension becomes visible, but the cause is usually capacity or scheduling. Recording what is found gives the owners corporation something specific to take to the venue or the waste contractor.

How often should the mapping be revisited?

Whenever a tenancy or a use changes, since a new occupier can move a boundary without anyone updating a scope. A ground floor changing from retail to hospitality alters the waste picture entirely. Reviewing at tenancy change catches it at the point the assumption breaks rather than months later.

Get a fixed written quote for Pyrmont

Free walkthrough, scope in writing, price back within 24 hours.

Request a quote