The route is the risk, not the task
Mopping an amenities block is low risk anywhere. Reaching it across a yard where trucks are turning is not. On logistics sites the exposure sits in movement between areas, in the moment a cleaner steps out of a doorway, and in the times when a pedestrian is where a driver does not expect one. Site rules that address only the tasks miss most of the actual hazard.
So the scope should name the routes, not just the destinations. Which door is used, which marked walkway is followed, where the crossing points are, and what happens when a walkway is blocked by a load. Naming an alternative in advance is what stops a cleaner improvising a shortcut at eleven at night when the marked route is obstructed and nobody is available to ask.
